| |
Volume 2 Number 4 ● Winter 2007 (Oct-Dec 2007) |
|
|
|
| |
FINANCING FORCE MODERNISATION
|
1 |
| |
|
In his Keynote Address
at the 4th Subroto Seminar on Aerospace Power, Shri Vinod
K. MIsra, former Secretary Defence (Finance), emphasized that the
essential thrust of our modernisation effort has to involve a distinct
superiority over our immediate neighbour and a strong dissuasive
capability for the rest. It also has to factor in reasonable strategic
capability by way of handling out of area contingencies in sync with our
current aspiration s as a significant voice in the Asian region and the
world. He also reminds us that acquisitions and upgrades of weapons
platforms alone would not modernise us adequately and attention would
simultaneously have to be devoted to the necessary dynamic reorientation
of doctrines, strategy, tactics, operations and training as well.
|
|
| |
AIRSPACE MANAGEMENT: A SYNERGISED APPROACH
|
13 |
| |
|
Wing Commander Atul
Kumar Singh, VSM in his article argues that air traffic in India has
been increasing at a phenomenal pace in recent years. Among the numerous
advantages and challenges that this poses in terms of infrastructure and
management, that of airspace management stands our and requires a
multi-agency synergistic approach. The Indian Air Force continues be
responsible for the air defence of the national airspace while the
Airports Authority of India carries the responsibility for managing
civil air traffic. Increase in civil (and military) air traffic would
require much deeper synergy between the two agencies to ensure
efficiency and safety, argues Atul. |
|
| |
ROLES
AND MISSIONS OF THE INDIAN AIR FORCE – 2032 AD |
37 |
| |
|
The air force in the
future would be influenced by changing technologies, weapon systems and
operational requirements. This necessisates close attention to the
future imperatives of the Indian Air Force (IAF), argues Air Marshal
Vinod Patney SUYSM PVSM AVSM Vrc (Retd), former AOC-in-C Western Air
Command. The IAF is only one of the contributors towards “military
power,” but it is the specialist Service to exploit the vertical
dimension. Also implicit in the definition is the conviction that even
though a single Service operation is a valid operation of war, it will
be beneficial if it is the result of joint planning. Unquestionably, the
major military requirement is to achieve the maximum possible degree of
air dominance, because the effectiveness of air power in war will be
governed by the degree of air dominance that can be achieved. An
important mission for the air force must also be attacking targets and
target systems deep into enemy country in order to definitely carry the
war to the enemy as well a to expand the battle space to advantage,
particularly if we are the stronger air force. The enemy should feel our
presence throughout their territory if possible. Expansion of the battle
space will put the enemy increasingly on the defensive. |
|
| |
CHANGE AND CONTINUITY IN WARFARE: AN INDIAN EXPERIENCE |
57 |
| |
|
In
his article, Brigadier P.K. Mallick argues that while 4th
Generation Warfare would remain a serious challenge, the risk of
conventional war would require a significant reorientation of force
structures and deployments. He questions the efficacy of a couple of
large sized strike corps going deep into the heart land of Pakistan and
believes that the utility of currently structured holdings and strike
corps is minimal. The question whether the existing organisation of the
field army into corps, divisions and brigades should be retained, or a
more flexible organisation of “task forces” directly controlled by a
divisional or corps headquarters should be introduced, he believes,
requires to be considered |
|
| |
DISINFORMATION AND NATIONAL DEFENCE |
79 |
| |
|
Psychological warfare
and propaganda have been an intrinsic part of warfare from time
immemorial. Air Marshal V.K. Verma AVSM VM VSM believes that the
information age offers tremendous new opportunities in an era wherein
information is power; hence, disinformation and propaganda regain
relevance as non lethal weapons where the vehicle for propelling these
weapons is the media. This should be exploited to spread disinformation
and influence public perceptions, both within our own country as well as
abroad. He makes a strong case for the need for our military and the
other national security elements to carve out an organisation so that we
can exploit these non-lethal weapons fully. |
|
| |
NETWORK – CENTRIC WARFARE AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS
|
95 |
| |
|
Air Commodore M.
Matheswaran VM examines network – centric warfare (NCW) at the
tactical as well as strategic level. He argues that NCW requires changes
in behaviour, process, and organisation to convert the advances of
information age capabilities into combat power Fighting network-centric
rather than platform – centric warfare would necessitate changing how we
train, organise, and allocate our resources. Delays will mean higher
costs and reduced combat power. If adversary targets are neutralised by
NCW systems before they can engage in fighting with out forces, then the
battle can be finished before it has really begun. |
|
| |
LEVERAGING OUTER SPACE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY
|
121 |
| |
|
Dr. (Ms) Ranjana Kaul
believes that that national security is symbiotically linked to the
rapid changes taking place in the global space industry, bringing new
challenges every day. The development of space security doctrines
embedded in national security goals, of new space weapons systems;
threat of deionisation of outer space; new arms race; obscuring boundary
between air space and outer space; incalculable commercial gains from
space related activities; shrinking natural resources in outer space;
non-state and hostile entities with resources at command all demand that
India’s national security policy is empowered with an appropriate space
policy together with attendant procedures and legislation to support it.
|
|
| |
PAKISTAN’S NUCLEAR POSTURE: IMPLICATIONS OF INDO-US COOPERATION
|
147 |
| |
|
Noting the shifts in
Pakistan’s nuclear posture since the early days after the nuclear tests
in 1998, Professor Peter R. Lavoy identifies five main featuers
of Pakistan’s strategic deterrence policy and these are described in
some detail. A set of new long term Pakistani strategic concerns
stimulated by the expanding US-India partnership is identified and
analysed. The basic point is that, in the perception of Pakistan,
projected developments in India’s nuclear and conventional military
capabilities eventually could threaten the survivability of Pakistan’s
strategic deterrent, which ahs always been a major concern for the
country’s defence planners.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|