| |
Volume 2 Number 3 ● Monsoon 2007 (Jul-Sep 2007) |
|
|
|
|
AEROSPACE POWER IN A
CHANGING NATIONAL SECURITY ENVIRONMENT |
|
| |
|
Air Chief Marshal F. H. Major PVSM AVSM SC VM ADC, chief of the Air
Staff Indian Air force (IAF), in his address on Aerospace Power in a
Changing National Security Environment emphasises that there is a
host of vital interests that lie way beyond the homeland and determine
that we refer to as our “strategic boundaries”. These remote interests
must be protected and that is a largely military function in which the
IAF would play a critically vital role. |
|
| |
WINNING THE NEXT WAR
– JOINTLY |
|
| |
|
Air Commodore
Jasjit Singh AVSM VrC VM (Retd) has argued that joint operations
would required deep abiding trust among the three Services which has
been a problem even in military forces like those of the United States,
organizationally integrated for decades. The core of building
professional institutional trust is to remove professional tensions,
especially between ground and air forces. |
|
| |
PRINCIPLES OF WAR:
DO THEY REQUIRE A RETHINK? |
|
| |
|
Air Marshal A.V.
Vaidya VM emphasises that changes in the nature of war and advance
in modern technology, besides other factors us to reexamine the
long-standing principles of war and see that changes are required to
meet the requirements of fighting a future war and sinning it. |
|
| |
EFFECT – BASED
OPERATIONS |
|
| |
|
Air Marshal Vinod
Patney, SYSM PVSM AVSM VrC (Retd), former AOC-in-C Western Air
Command, writes that intelligence information about the adversaries can
never be complete. And if EBO is to be used for contingency planning by
the armed forces, the adversary must be viewed as a complex adaptive
system. |
|
| |
FROM WINNING TO
DETERRING: CHINA’S CHANGING DISCOURSE ON DEFENCE |
|
| |
|
Professor
Srikanth Kondapalli examines China’s White Papers on National
Defence to interpret the change taking place in China’s defence policy
and posture. The central conclusion is that China continues to believe
in Sun Tzu’s precepts of influencing the behavior of the adversary as a
prelude to fighting and winning wars. A modern military force able to
conduct high-technology warfare remains integral to this philosophy.
|
|
| |
PAKISTAN’S NUCLEAR
DOCTRINE AND STRATEGY |
|
| |
|
Pakistan’s nuclear
doctrine and strategy has been clouded by a great deal of obfuscation
and ambiguities. What we can do is to arrive at some assumptions on
which Pakistan would base its nuclear strategy. Dr. (Mrs) Manpreet
Sethi explores the direction in which Pakistan has been moving in
shaping its nuclear doctrine and strategy, wherein rhetoric and
substance have often over lapped. What has been amply clear is that its
policy of brinkmanship that exploits uncertainty and rests on a
perception of irrationality, however, carries the risk of deterrence
breakdown. |
|
| |
IRANIAN POLITICAL
SYSTEM AND THE IRGC |
|
| |
|
Iran’s political
system is complex and unique in terms of the overlapping roles and
functions of its various components. Shelly Johny examines the
complexities of the political system and concludes that the IRGC
actually wields power and influence that transcend the formally
established system of check and balances. |
|
| |
RUSSIA’S AIR DEFENCE
STRATEGY |
|
| |
|
As was to be
expected, Russia’s air defence strategy has under gone many changes
after the end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet
Union. Wing Commander Atul K. Singh VSM identifies that the
current air power doctrine flows from the concept that the success of
ground operations increasingly depends upon air force missions, from
achieving air supremacy until the moment the enemy surrenders. |
|
| |
THE
INFORMATION-BASED RMA AND THE PRINCIPLES OF WAR |
|
| |
|
Major Leonard G.
Litton, USAF, examines the principles of war from a different
perspective: that of the implications of the information-based
revolution in military affairs (RMA) on the traditional principles of
war. Litton argues that he revolution of the information-based RMA has
shown us that as the times have changed, so must the paradigm we hold of
the principles of war. Essentially, the information-based RMA will
reinforce the principle of the offensive. This implies that the age-old
requirement for the offence to concentrate forces in order to break
through the defence is greatly reduced under the information-based RMA.
Other charges demand a review of the traditional principles of war. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|